Essential California Law
|
Essential Employment Laws for California Employers
One of the most difficult aspects of being a small business owner
is deciphering which of the many California employment laws apply to
your company. Compliance with many of California ’s employment
laws is dependent on the number of employees your company has. This
article aims to assist small businesses to determine which of California ’s
many employment laws are applicable to them. This is a summary
only, and is not a substitute for legal advice regarding the particular
rules that may apply to your company depending on your circumstances,
type of industry, and other factors.
I. Employers
with Two or More Employees.
California employers with 2 or more employees are required to comply
with the following laws:
- · Cal-COBRA: The
California Continuation Benefits Replacement Act of 1997 (Cal-COBRA)
requires insurance carriers and HMOs to provide COBRA-like coverage
for employees of smaller employers (two to 19 employees) not subject
to COBRA. To be covered by Cal-COBRA, an employer must have employed
2-19 eligible employees on at least 50% working days during the preceding
calendar year or, if not in business during any part of the preceding
calendar year, employed 2-19 eligible employees on at least 50% of
working days during the preceding calendar quarter.
- · Child
Labor Laws: Employment of minors is regulated under
numerous authorities such as the California Labor Code, the Education
Code, the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), and others.
These laws discuss work permits, record keeping, wages, and possible
penalties when codes or laws are violated.
- · State
Disability Insurance and Paid Family Leave: The
State Disability Insurance (SDI) and Paid Family Leave (PFL) programs
are state-mandated wage replacement benefits funded through employee
payroll deductions. They are administered by California 's Employment
Development Department (EDD).
- · Employee
Safety Laws: These laws include information on domestic
violence, drug-free workplace, ergonomics, violence in the workplace,
general employee safety and Cal-OSHA compliance.
- · The
Immigration Reform and Control Act: Federal immigration
and naturalization laws impose complex compliance requirements
on every employer, regardless of size. Among other things, these
laws require employers to institute procedures for verifying that
an individual is authorized to work in the United States . They
also establish civil and criminal penalties for knowingly hiring,
referring, recruiting, or retaining in employment “unauthorized
aliens” when they are identified.
- · Independent
Contractor Laws: The distinction between direct
employment and indirect employment (temporary workers, leased employees,
and independent contractors) is often blurred by details of the
arrangements and laws or court decisions designed to protect the
interests of workers. For example, the California Labor Commissioner
believes that approximately 95% of all workers in California are
truly employees and not independent contractors.
- · New
Employee Reporting Laws: These laws include requiring
certain information be reported to the EDD upon hiring of employees. Employers
must report an employee’s full name, Social Security number,
home address and start-of-work date to the EDD.
- · Required
Posters and Notices for the Workplace: State and
federal laws require employers to conspicuously display a variety
of posters in all workplaces where they can be easily read by employees
and job applicants. Additionally, employers are required to distribute
notices or pamphlets to their employees either when they are hired
or in connection with certain events. Failure to comply with these
requirements can be punishable by a fine, imprisonment, or both.
- · Privacy
Laws: California is one of seven states that provide a
constitutional right to privacy in addition to further limitations
which are imposed by federal and state statutes, and case law.
- · Sexual
Harassment: Sexual harassment in the workplace has become
a serious area of concern, considering that an employer’s
liability is extended for acts committed by supervisors and rank-and-file
employees.
- · Smoking
in the Workplace: California Labor Code section
6404.5, which took effect in 1995, placed a uniform statewide ban
on smoking in the workplace, with limited exceptions, and overrode
local ordinances on the subject. The law specifically supersedes
any local ordinances regulating smoking in the workplace.
- · Time-Off: Both
California and federal laws provide for certain instances in which
an employer must allow an employee time off work. These may
include, with certain caveats, Pregnancy Disability Leave, Paid Family
Leave, military leave, leave for victims of violent crime, domestic
violence and sexual assault, time off related to a child’s
school disciplinary action, time off for jury or witness duty and
time off for voting.
- · Unemployment
Insurance: The unemployment insurance (UI) system
in the United States is a federal/state program. The cost of the
program in California is financed by employers through state and
federal UI taxes.
- · Wage
and Hour Laws: California 's wage and hour laws
are among the toughest in the nation. When the federal law sets
a standard, California often goes beyond that standard, requiring
more of employers. With dual sets of regulations, the law easily
becomes confusing, thus making compliance a challenging exercise. Topics
in this area include California standards for exempt versus nonexempt
employees, hourly wages, overtime, incentive pay, special pay arrangements,
payment of wages, deductions from wages, maximum and minimum hours
of work, meal and rest periods, recording time worked, travel time,
prep time and educational and training time.
- · Workers’ Compensation: Workers’ compensation
insurance is a no-fault insurance system. If an employee is injured
on the job, the employer is liable for the employee’s temporary
disability benefits, medical expenses, and possibly a permanent disability
award based on the long-term effects of the injury. The workers’ compensation
program is a trade-off that exchanges an employer’s limited
absolute liability for work-related injuries and illnesses for the
employees’ common law right to sue for damages.
II. Employers with
Four or More Employees.
California employers with 4 or more employees are also required to
comply with laws regarding discrimination toward foreign workers.
III. Employers with Five
or More Employees.
California employers with five or more employees are also required
to comply with state discrimination laws, including the Fair Employment
and Housing Act, and pregnancy disability laws. California employers
are required to recognize and, therefore, avoid unlawful discrimination
in the workplace. In addition, employees who work for employers
with five or more employees, and who are disabled by pregnancy and
pregnancy-related conditions, are eligible for California pregnancy
disability leave (PDL) and may be eligible for Family and Medical Act
(FMLA) leave, but not for California Family Rights Act (CFRA) leave.
IV. Are Shareholders or
Partners Considered “Employees”?
Before
an employer can analyze which laws apply to his company, the employer
must take a head count of its employees. A question faced by
many employers is whether to count business partners, shareholders,
officers or directors as employees. Are these individuals considered “employees” for
compliance purposes?
The
United States Supreme Court said that enforcement agencies and courts
could examine the relationship between a company and its shareholders
to determine whether they should be considered employees. Specifically,
the Supreme Court said that an individual's right to control the business
determines whether he or she is an employee. It relied on the
following six factors created by the federal Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC) as among those to be considered:
- · Can the organization
hire or fire the individual or set the rules and regulations for
his/her work?
- · What is the
extent to which the organization supervises his/her work?
- · Does he/she
report to someone higher in the organization?
- · How much influence
is he/she able to exert over the organization?
- · What relationship
is intended, as expressed in oral or written agreements?
- · Does he/she
share in the profits, losses, and liabilities of the organization?
While not exhaustive, this list illustrates the factors that enforcement
agencies and courts may use to determine whether shareholders, directors,
officers, or partners in a small business are to be treated as employees
for law enforcement purposes.
This Memo was prepared by Stacey L. Fell. For more information, contact:
|
Stacey L. Fell
|
staceylfell@hotmail.com
|
|
Michael D. Schley
|
805-966-2940
|
|
|
Joseph F. Look
|
805-688-9226
|
|
|
Ian M. Guthrie
|
805-966-2985
|
|
|
Brett Locker
|
805-963-4929
|
|
|
|