The Pension Protection Act of 2006:
Consequences for Planned Givers
(and Planned Receivers)
by
Michael D. Schley
SCHLEY LOOK & GUTHRIE LLP
www.slglegal.com
Presentation to the
Planned Giving Roundtable of Santa
Barbara
September 15, 2006
© 2006 Michael D. Schley
Introduction: The federal Pension Protection
Act of 2006 (“PPA”) was signed into law on August 17, 2006
. This outline summarizes the provisions of the PPA that may have
the most effect on exempt organizations, with special attention to planned
giving activities.
This outline is for informational purposes only and is not intended
to be a substitute for professional legal or tax advice based on the
facts of your situation.
1. Qualified Charitable Distributions
from IRAs
- 1.1. Old
law: In order to donate from a traditional
IRA to a charity, a taxpayer would have to take the distribution
into income and then claim a charitable deduction for the gift.
- A. Problem: Taxpayers
who do not itemize could not claim the deduction.
- B. Problem: Taxpayers
at the 50% AGI limit could not claim a deduction for the excess.
- C. Problem: Taxpayers
with “tax friction” could still end up paying net tax
on the gifted amount (because of the effect of increased AGI on
certain deductions).
- D. Problem: Some states
(unlike CA) do not allow itemized deductions. In those states,
a taxpayer making a donation from an IRA would be subject to state
income tax on the amount.
- 1.2. New
law: The new law permits (in 2006 and 2007
only) taxpayers age 70-1/2 or over to exclude from gross income
charitable gift distributions of up to $100,000 per year from
a traditional individual retirement account (IRA) or Roth IRA
which would otherwise be included in income.
- 1.3. Does
this work in California ?
A: Yes. California ’s tax laws conform to
federal tax law on the issue of inclusion or exclusion of distributions
from IRAs.
Beware: A California charity should not assume that all
donors are subject only to CA rules. Some states may tax charitable
IRA distributions.
- 1.4. The
details:
- A. Effective for 2006 and 2007.
- · The new
law took effect on August 17, 2006 , but is retroactive on this
issue. Specifically, new §408(d)(8)(A) of the Code
applies to any qualified distributions made between 12/31/2005
and 1/1/2008 . This may affect tax planning done for gifts
already made earlier in 2006.
- · Unless IRS
regulations provide otherwise, the timing would depend upon the
date of delivery of the gift – when actually delivered
(or postmarked).
- B. Lifetime transfers only. The
exclusion provided by the new law applies only to distributions
during the life of the taxpayer. Rules relating to testamentary
transfers remain unchanged.
- C. Age 70-1/2 or older.
Though this requirement seems straightforward, there is potential
for confusion because almost all taxpayers are aware of a different
rule requiring them to begin receiving minimum required distributions in
the year that they attain age 70-1/2.
- D. Traditional and Roth IRAs only.
- · The new
law applies only to traditional and Roth IRAs.
- · It does
not apply to SEP, SAR-SEP, SIMPLE, MSA or HSA accounts, or to
401(k) or other qualified pension plan accounts.
- · However,
the taxpayer may be able to roll over the ineligible account
into a traditional IRA, to enable a qualified charitable distribution
under the new rule.
- · Does the
provision apply to inherited IRAs?
- E. Up to $100,000 per year per
taxpayer.
- · The $100,000
annual limit is based on the aggregate amount of a taxpayer's
qualified charitable distributions in a year. Thus, an individual's
tax-free IRA donations may consist of one or more distributions,
from one or more IRAs, donated to one or more charitable organizations,
as long as the aggregate amount does not exceed $100,000 in a
year.
- · Note that
a married couple could donate $200,000, if they each have the
IRA resources to do so.
- · There is
no carryover provision – i.e., if charitable IRA distributions
exceed the $100,000 limit, there is no ability to apply the excess
to a future year’s exclusion.
- · The IRS
will adopt rules that exclude qualified charitable distributions
from withholding requirements.
- F. Qualified charitable
distributions count toward minimum distribution requirements
for IRAs.
- 1.5. What
are eligible charities?
- A. Charities described in §170(b)(1)(A)
- · These are
generally known as “50% charities” because taxpayers
may give up to 50% of AGI to them in deductible contributions. These
generally include:
(1) churches (or church conventions or associations);
(2) tax-exempt educational organizations;
(3) tax-exempt hospitals and certain medical research organizations;
(4) certain organizations holding property for state and local colleges
and universities;
(5) a U.S. state or possession, or any political subdivision of any
of these, or the U.S. or the District of Columbia , if the contribution
is for exclusively public purposes;
(6) organizations organized and operated exclusively for charitable,
religious, educational, scientific or literary purposes, or for the prevention
of cruelty to children or animals, or to foster national or international
amateur sports competition if they normally get a substantial part of
their support from the government or general public;
(7) private operating foundations;
(8) certain membership organizations more than one-third of whose support
comes from the public.
- B. The law excludes §509(a)(3) supporting
organizations and §4966(d)(2) donor-advised
funds.
- C. Problem: The
exclusion of donor-advised funds and most private foundations means
that the money is truly “out the door” once given. This
effect can be mitigated by gifts to:
- · Field of
interest funds.
- · Scholarships.
- · Restricted
or general endowments (provided that the donor has no advisory
rights).
- 1.6. Other
mechanical issues
- A. Custodians’ responsibilities. IRA
custodians must adopt new policies and procedures to implement
this new law, and must address:
- · Must the
custodian verify the eligibility of the receiving charity?
- · What are
the procedures for withholding exemption?
- · Will there
be a separate 1099-R reason code for reporting?
- · Will the
custodian have a duty to report the identity of the donor to
the charity?
- · Can the
distribution be made in securities, or must it be cash?
- B. Distribution cannot be made
to taxpayer. If the taxpayer requests a distributions
directly to him or her, planning to then contribute it, the old
rules will apply.
- · Perhaps
a taxpayer could request a check payable to the charity, which
the taxpayer would deliver; but custodians might feel this is
too risky.
- C. Gift receipts are required.
- · The committee
technical explanation states that “sufficient substantiation” is
required. This means a written receipt in compliance with
IRS donation acknowledgement requirements (Treas. Reg. §1.170A-13(f)).
- · Warning: If
the donor receives any thing of value in consideration
for the gift, the entire exclusion will be jeopardized. Charities
must therefore be especially cautious regarding the types of
recognition they give to these donors.
- 1.7. What
if the IRA contains mixed pre-tax and after-tax contributions?
- A. The new law provides
special rules for counting taxable distributions as distributed
first. Example:
- · Donor has
$120,000 IRA, consisting of $75,000 in pre-tax contributions
and earnings and $45,000 in after-tax contributions and earnings.
- · Donor distributes
$100,000 to charity.
- · Treatment:
- (1) $75,000 is excluded from income
under the new rules.
- (2) $25,000 is included in income (to
the extent of untaxed earnings or appreciation) but available for deduction
(if the taxpayer itemizes deductions) under the old rules.
- B. The new law provides
for “morphing,” where multiple accounts are involved:
- · Donor has
two $100,000 IRAs, each consisting of $50,000 pre-tax and $50,000
after-tax contributions (including earnings and appreciation).
- · Donor gives
all of the funds in one account to an eligible charity.
- · Treatment:
- (1) The first $100,000 given to the
charity is treated as paid from pre-tax dollars, and is excluded from
income under the new rules.
- (2) The remaining IRA morphs into an
IRA consisting entirely of after-tax contributions (and their earnings/appreciation).
- C. Issue: How
will the custodian know how to characterize the distributions? Given
the portability of IRAs, custodians generally do not track pre-tax
and after-tax contributions. Yet, they will apparently have
a duty to report the nature of the distribution to the IRS.
- 2. NEW RULES FOR CHARITABLE
CONTRIBUTIONS
The following changes are effective for tax years beginning after 8/17/06
, unless otherwise noted:
- 2.1. The
Act disallows any charitable deduction for any contribution of a cash,
check, or other monetary gift unless the donor maintains
as a record of the contribution a bank record or a written communication
from the donee showing the name of the donee organization, the
date of the contribution, and the amount of the contribution. There
is no longer a $250 de minimis exception.
Comment: Unless a charity issues receipt letters for every
donation, this will require donors to keep copies of cancelled checks
(or perhaps credit or debit card statements showing the payee, amount
and date).
- 2.2. Donated clothing
and household items must be in “good used condition
or better” to permit a fair-market value donation.
- A. Exception: The
IRS may further exclude from deductibility donated items of minimal
value, such as used socks or underwear.
- B. Exception: The “condition
condition” does not apply to a donation of >$500 where
there is a substantiating qualified appraisal.
- C. “Household
items” include furniture, furnishings, electronics, appliances,
linens and similar items.
- · They do
not include food, paintings, antiques and other art objects,
jewelry, gems, or collections.
- 2.3. Special
rules allowing above-basis book inventory donations
to schools, and donations of “apparently wholesome
food” to charities serving food to the needy, have
been retroactively revived for 2006 and 2007.
- 2.4. Effective 9/1/06
, tangible personal property gifts exceeding $5,000
trigger new requirements:
- A. Prior rules required
(i) a limitation of the deduction for tangible personal property
to the taxpayer’s basis if the property is not used
by the charity for its exempt purposes, and (ii) a report from
the charity to IRS of any disposition of exempt-purpose property
within 2 years of the gift.
- B. New rules relating
to premature dispositions:
- · If the property
is sold within the year of gift, the deduction must be reduced
to basis.
- · If the property
is sold within the following tax years and prior to the third
anniversary of the gift, the taxpayer must recognize ordinary
income equal to the excess of the deduction amount over
the taxpayer’s basis in the item.
- C. However, these effects
can be avoided if the charity certifies to the IRS, with a copy
to the donor, that either:
- · The property
was used, before disposition, for exempt purposes; or
- · The charity
intended to so use the property, but the intended use became
impossible or infeasible.
- D. Comments:
- · The certificate
requirement leaves the taxpayer at some jeopardy. Query
whether IRS regulations will permit the issuance of a contemporaneous
certificate, at the time of donation, where the property is to
be immediately used for an exempt purpose.
- · Donors may
be inclined to place limits on the sale of gifted property. However,
such limits will reduce the appraised value of the property.
- 2.5. Fractional
interest gifts (eff. for gifts after 8/17/06 )
- A. Prior law generally
permitted a deduction for a gift of an undivided fractional interest
in the donor’s entire interest in property.
- B. New requirements:
- · All interests
in the items must be owned by the donor (or the donor and donee)
immediately prior to the gift.
- · Gifts of
additional fractional interests in the same property must be
valued at the lesser of FMV at the time of donation or
FMV at the time of the initial fractional interest donation.
(Remember that FMV is appropriate only for property used for
exempt purposes.)
- · The same
lesser-value rule applies even if the subsequent interest gift
is a bequest.
- · The gift
deduction(s) will be recaptured if the charity does not have
substantial possession and use of the property and the balance
of the interests are not contributed before the earlier of (i)
donor’s death or (ii) 10th anniversary of the initial fractional
interest gift. Furthermore, the new law imposes a penalty
equal to 10% of the recaptured deduction.
Comment: Fractional interest gifts of artwork have been
a popular way of getting a deduction while being able to enjoy the art
for certain periods during the balance of the donor’s life. The
10-year restriction will probably curtail many such gifts.
- 2.6. Gifts
by S Corporations (in 2006 & 2007) of appreciated property
will reduce shareholder “outside” basis only by the
corporation’s adjusted basis in the property (thus
bringing S corporations into parity with partnerships).
- 3. QUALIFIED CONSERVATION DONATIONS
- 3.1. Conservation
easements increased to 50% of AGI. Effective for
tax years 2006 and 2007, Section 1206 of the Pension Protection
Act of 2006 amends Section 170 of the Code to allow a 50% deduction
(increased from 30%) for capital gain property that constitutes
a qualified conservation contribution donated by an individual
to a Code Section 170(b)(1)(A) organization.
- 3.2. Qualified
farmers and ranchers: Up to 100% of adjusted taxable income. If
the donor is a qualified farmer or rancher, he/she is allowed a
deduction up to 100% of the excess of his/her contribution base
over all other allowable charitable contributions.
- A. This applies to a
nonpublicly traded farming or ranching corporation, except that
the contribution base is taxable income, as adjusted.
- B. A qualifed rancher
or farmer realizes more than 50% of his/her income from farming
or ranching.
- C. The land must be “generally
available” for farming or ranching – but need not actually
be used for those purposes.
- 3.3. Carryforward
for 15 years. Any excess allowable deduction may
be carried forward for fifteen years (formerly 5 years).
- 3.4. Preservation
easements are limited. Preservation donations in
registered historic districts will qualify now only if they preserve
the entire exterior of the building. Former law allowed
a deduction for façade preservation or raw land in a historic
district.
- 4. APPRAISERS AND MISVALUATION
PENALTIES
- 4.1. Any
donated property valued in excess of $5,000 must be appraised by
a “qualified appraiser”:
- · Appraisal
designation from a recognized appraiser organization; or
- · Meets education
and experience standards in new regulations to be published by
the IRS.
- 4.2. Note: As
before, the “qualified appraisal” substantiating the
value must be:
- A. Made within 60 days
before the date of the donation.
- B. Summarized in an
attachment to the taxpayer’s return.
- C. Misvaluation penalties
have been strengthened:
- 4.3. New
standards for penalties on misevaluations:
|
|
Old Rule
|
New Rule
|
|
“substantial” misvaluation (income tax returns)
|
200%
|
150%
|
|
“gross” misvaluation
(income tax returns)
|
400%
|
200%
|
|
“substantial” misvaluation
(estate/gift tax returns)
|
50%
|
65%
|
|
“gross” misvaluation
(estate/gift tax returns)
|
25%
|
40%
|
- 4.4. The
2006 Pension Act also eliminates the reasonable cause exception for
gross valuation misstatements with respect to charitable deduction
property. The exception continues to apply, as under pre-2006 Pension
Act law, to substantial valuation overstatements with respect to
charitable deduction property, i.e., it applies if the appraisal
and investigation requirements are met.
- 4.5. Appraisers
are now subject to a new penalty, for appraisers only, that can be
assessed for substantial or gross misvaluations: generally,
the greater of 10% of the tax underpayment or 125% of the appraisal
fee.
- 5. NEW RESTRICTIONS ON DONOR-ADVISED
FUNDS
- 5.1. Excise
taxes. These new excise taxes treat donor-advised
funds in a manner similar to private foundations:
- A. Taxes on the sponsoring
organization and fund managers who make “taxable distributions.”
- B. More-than-incidental
benefits to a donor or fund-related person now trigger special
excise taxes.
- C. Excise taxes are
imposed on excess business holdings.
- D. Donors and investment advisers
are deemed “disqualified persons” for excess benefit
transaction taxes.
- E. Grants, loans or
similar payments to a donor or a related person are automatically
deemed excess benefit transactions on a dollar-for-dollar basis.
- 5.2. Reporting. Sponsoring
organizations must now file information returns reporting the total
number of donor advised funds held, their aggregate value, aggregate
contributions, and aggregate grants.
- A. Comment: This
is still much more lenient than the detailed reporting requirements
imposed on private foundations.
- 5.3. Supporting
organizations: Similar rules have also been adopted
for certain types of supporting organizations.
- 5.4. Studies: The
Act requires the Secretary of the Treasury to study donor-advised
funds and supporting organizations, and to report on various issues,
including whether contributions to these organizations should be
deductible.
- 6. NEW RULES FOR PRIVATE FOUNDATIONS
- 6.1. Congress
addressed challenges to IRS regulations by codifying these capital
gain/loss rules for purposes of the excise tax on investment income:
- A. Capital gains and
losses subject to the excise tax on net investment income include
capital gains from appreciation, including capital gains and losses
from the sale or other disposition of assets used to further
an exempt purpose – unless the property is exchanged
under new rules similar to those governing §1031 like-kind
exchanges.
- B. Capital loss carrybacks
are not permitted.
- 6.2. Distributions
to certain supporting organizations are not qualifying distributions.
- 6.3. Taxed
investment income includes income from annuities and similar instruments.
- 7. EXEMPT ORGANIZATION TAX
RETURNS AND FILINGS
- 7.1. Unrelated
Business Income Tax (“UBIT”) Returns (Form
990-T), previously confidential, must now be made publicly available
if filed after 8/17/06 . This rule applies only to 501(c)(3)
organizations.
- A. However, as with
exemption applications and other 990 returns, the taxpayer may
ask for confidentiality of trade secrets, patents and similar information.
- 7.2. IRS
Reports to State Officials
- A. Former law required the
IRS to report to state officials (in CA, the attorney general and
the FTB) an adverse exemption determination, a revocation of exemption,
or a notice of deficiency against a charity. In connection
therewith, the IRS must provide related file information on the
charity.
- B. The new law permits the
IRS to disclose to the same state officials a proposed adverse
determination, revocation or tax deficiency notice, and to provide
related file information.
- C. The new law also
strengthens limits on the improper disclosure by IRS or a state
official of any of the information so provided, and provides criminal
sanctions and civil remedies.
- 7.3. Information
Filings Now Required of ALL Charities
- A. Prior law and IRS
regulations exempted organizations with gross revenue normally
under $25,000 from filing returns.
- B. The new law requires
every charity exempted from the return requirement to file electronically
an annual information return stating:
- · Legal name
- · Any fictitious
business name(s)
- · Mailing
address
- · Website
URL (if any)
- · Name and
address of principal officer
- · Evidence
of continuing exemption from return requirements.
- C. A nonprofit may have
its exemption revoked if it fails to file for three consecutive
years.
- D. The IRS is required to
publicize this new requirement.
- E. Effective: For
annual periods beginning after 2006.
- 7.4. Charities
must now report dispositions of tangible personal property made
within 3 years of the gift (see 2.4 above).
- 7.5. Information
returns of parent tax-exempt organizations must now include information
about transactions with controlled entities (eff. for
returns due after 8/17/06 ).
- 7.6. Charities
that acquire interests in life insurance contracts within two years
of 8/17/06 must file special
returns reporting this information.
- A. IRS must conduct
a study, and report to Congress, on whether charities are improperly
sharing their insurable interests in donors with investors.
- 7.7. The
new law increases the penalty on split-interest-trusts (e.g. charitable
remainder annuity and unitrusts and pooled income funds) for failure
to file a return and failure to properly report required information.
- A. The penalty is $20
for each day the failure continues up to $10,000. For trusts with
gross income in excess of $250,000, the penalty is $100 per day
up to $50,000.
- B. If any officer, director,
trustee or other individual under a duty to file or include required
information, knowingly fails to file the return or include required
information, such person is personally liable for such penalty,
in addition to the penalty imposed upon the entity. This provision
is effective for taxable years after December 31, 2006 .
- 8. PENALTY EXCISE TAXES ON
CHARITIES AND PRIVATE FOUNDATIONS ARE GENERALLY DOUBLED
- 8.1. For
acts of self-dealing, the initial tax on the self-dealer is increased
from 5% to 10% of the amount involved.
- 8.2. The
initial tax on foundation managers for acts of self-dealing is increased
from 2.5% to 5% of the amount involved.
- 8.3. The
dollar limitation is increased from $10,000 per act to $20,000 per
act.
- 8.4. The
initial tax on a private foundation for failure to distribute income
is increased from 15% to 30% of the undistributed amount.
- 8.5. The
initial tax on excess business holdings is increased from 5% to 10%
of the value of the holdings.
- 8.6. For
jeopardizing investments, the initial tax imposed on the foundation
and foundation managers is increased from 5% to 10% of the amount
of the investment.
- 8.7. The
dollar limitation on the initial tax on foundation managers is increased
from $5,000 to $10,000 per investment. The dollar limitation on the
additional tax on foundation managers is increased from $10,000 to
$20,000 per investment.
- 8.8. For
taxable expenditures, the initial tax on the foundation is increased
from 10% to 20% of the amount of the expenditure.
- 8.9. The
initial tax on the foundation manager is increased from 2.5% to 5%
of the amount of the expenditure.
- 8.10. The dollar
limitation on the initial tax on foundation managers is increased
from $5,000 to $10,000. The dollar limitation on the additional tax
on foundation managers is increased from $10,000 to $20,000.
- 8.11. The dollar
limitation on the tax imposed on organization managers of public
charities and social welfare organizations for participation in excess
benefit transactions is increased from $10,000 to $20,000 per transaction.
- 9. OTHER TOPICS IN THE NEW
LAW
- 9.1. Charitable
contributions of taxidermy property.
- 9.2. Certain
transactions between parent and controlled entities.
- 9.3. Debt
management plan services and credit counseling organizations.
- 9.4. Tax
exempt employers of proctors for college entrance and placement exams.
- 9.5. Conventions
or associations of churches.
- 9.6. Qualified
blood collector organizations.
|