Two New Laws
|
Two New California Laws Impose
Consumer Information Security Obligations
Two new California laws, effective January 1, 2005, may significantly
affect companies that do business with California residents. These
new laws impose new requirements on businesses with respect to the
maintaining and sharing of personal information about California residents.
Prior California law regulated some aspects of the handling of customer
records. For example, prior law required that a business take all reasonable
steps to destroy a customer’s records in its custody or control
when they are no longer to be retained.1 Specifically,
businesses were and are required to shred, erase, or otherwise modify
the personal information in those records to make it unreadable or
undecipherable through any means.2 Prior California
law also required businesses to disclose to their customers and others
any breach of the security of any system, when that breach might have
allowed an unauthorized person to acquire unencrypted personal information
about a California resident.3
Prior California law did not, however, specifically require a business
to implement and maintain procedures and practices to protect personal
customer information, nor did existing law provide a right of a California
resident to learn what information has been disclosed to third parties.
Assembly Bill 1950 ("AB 1950"), which adds section 1798.81.5
to the California Civil Code, and Senate Bill 27 ("SB 27"),
which adds section 1798.83 to the California Civil Code, imposed these
requirements for the first time.
Assembly Bill 1950
AB 1950 imposes requirements on businesses that maintain personal
information, in any form, about one or more California residents.
Who must comply with AB 1950?
AB 1950 applies to all companies that have business relationships
with California residents, except those that are regulated by state
or federal law providing greater protection to personal information
than is provided by AB 1950. Those companies not subject to
AB 1950 include:
|
Health care providers regulated by the Confidentiality of
Medical Information Act;
|
|
Banks and other financial institutions subject to the California
Financial Information Privacy Act; and
|
|
Covered entities governed by the Health Insurance Portability
and Availability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).
|
What are the requirements of AB 1950?
AB 1950 has two basic requirements:
-
All businesses that possess personal information about California
residents must implement and maintain security procedures to protect
that personal information; and
-
All businesses that disclose personal information about California
residents to a third party must require that the third party maintain
security procedures to protect the personal information.
Personal information. Under AB 1950, "personal information" means
an individual’s first name or first initial and his or her last
name, in combination with any one or more of the following data elements:
-
The person’s social security number;
-
The person’s driver’s license number or California
identification card number;
-
The person’s account number, credit or debit card number,
in combination with any required security code, access code, or
password that would permit access to an individual’s financial
account; or
-
Medical information about the person.4
Personal information does not include information that is lawfully
made available to the general public from federal, state, or local
government records.
Required security procedures under AB 1950. AB 1950 does
not set forth specific security procedures that businesses must follow
to ensure compliance. Rather, the new law requires businesses to "implement
and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices appropriate
to the nature of the information, to protect the personal information
from unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification, or disclosure."
Notably, however, AB 1950 excludes from its definition of "personal
information" any information that is encrypted or redacted. Therefore,
a business that encrypts all personal information stored on its computers
will only need to worry about adequately protecting non-computer based
information (e.g., paper reports containing personal information,
customer receipts, etc.).
In addition to implementing its own security procedures, if the business
discloses personal information about a California resident to a third
party, then the business must require by contract that the third party "implement
and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices appropriate
to the nature of the information, to protect the personal information
from unauthorized access, use, modification, or disclosure."
What are the consequences of failing to comply with AB 1950?
A violation of AB 1950 could subject the business to a lawsuit under
California’s Unfair Competition Law, which classifies "unlawful
business conduct" as one form of unfair competition, and provides
for civil penalties, private rights of action, and class actions against
businesses engaged in unfair competition.5
What can my business do to ensure compliance with AB 1950?
All businesses that conduct any business in California, or with California
residents, probably maintain, or have the potential of maintaining,
some sort of unencrypted personal information as defined by AB 1950.
Therefore, unless your business is exempt from the requirements of
AB 1950 (because the business is already subject to a more protective
state or federal law), management should consider taking the following
actions to ensure compliance:
-
Identify the kinds of personal information that the business collects
and maintains. Be sure to include paper-based as well as electronically-stored
personal information.
-
Determine the level of risk that the potential loss or unauthorized
disclosure of information poses to your business and to the public.
It may be helpful to create a risk-rating system for this purpose,
and assign each piece of personal information maintained a high,
medium, or low risk category.
-
Use the risk analysis to determine if your business’s security
measures and procedures are "reasonable." In making
this determination, weigh the costs of the protection that your
business currently provides (e.g., data encryption, backup,
fire safes, internal procedures, locked cabinets, insurance, etc.),
against the damages that the business would sustain if the data
were to be lost or improperly disclosed.
-
If necessary, adjust procedures and practices so that the type
and level of protection provided to the personal information is
appropriate for degree of risk of loss or improper disclosure of
that information.
We strongly encourage every business to document the risk analysis
described above, as well as the company’s standard operating
procedures that will ensure compliance with AB 1950. This is because,
in the event that a person brings an action for violation of AB 1950,
the business will be able to demonstrate that its protective measures
are not only reasonable, but that the business, in fact, adheres to
them.
Senate Bill 27
SB 27 requires any business that discloses a customer’s personal
information to a third party, for direct marketing purposes, to provide
the customer, within 30 days after the customer’s request, the
names and addresses of the recipients of that information and specified
details regarding the information disclosed.
Who must comply with SB 27?
Every business with 20 or more full-time or part-time employees is
subject to SB 27.
What are the requirements of SB 27?
With certain limited exceptions, SB 27 requires any business that
discloses personal information about a California resident to a third
party, when the business knows or reasonably should know that the third
party will use that personal information for direct marketing purposes,
to implement a system to enable California residents to request and
receive the details of the personal information that was shared with
the third party. Note, however, that this statute does not address
the legal requirements for disclosing personal information to third
parties. Therefore, a business should, before sharing any customer
data with any third party, ensure that its manner in doing so complies
with all applicable privacy laws.
Personal Information. The definition of personal information
under SB 27 is far more comprehensive than it is under AB 1950 (discussed
above). SB 27 defines personal information as "any information
that, when it was disclosed [by the customer to the business], identified,
described, or was able to be associated with an individual." SB
27 expressly includes all of the following as within the definition
of personal information:
-
An individual’s name and address;
-
Electronic mail address
-
Age or date of birth;
-
Names of children;
-
Electronic mail or other addresses of children;
-
Number of children;
-
The age or gender of children;
-
Height;
-
Weight;
-
Race;
-
Religion;
-
Occupation;
-
Telephone number;
-
Education;
-
Political party affiliation;
-
Medical condition;
-
Drugs, therapies, or medical products or equipment used;
-
The kind of product the customer purchased, leased, or rented;
-
Real property purchased, leased, or rented;
-
The kind of service provided;
-
Social security number;
-
Bank account number;
-
Credit card number;
-
Debit card number;
-
Bank or investment account, debit card, or credit card balance;
-
Payment history; and
-
Information pertaining to creditworthiness, assets, income or
liabilities.
For the purpose of SB 27, a "customer" as used in this memorandum
is any California resident engaged in a business relationship with
the company. This does not require that there have actually been a
consummated business transaction; only that one was contemplated. Thus,
for all practical purposes, any personal information that the business
collects from a customer or potential customer falls within the scope
of this law.
Accepting customer inquiries about personal information disclosed
to third parties. Under SB 27, a business that discloses personal
information to a third party, when that information may be used by
the third party for direct marketing purposes, must provide one or
more of the following methods for customers to request details about
the information disclosed:
|
Postal mail, provided that the business designates a specific
mailing address to which customers may send their inquiries;
|
|
Electronic mail, provided that the business designates a
specific electronic mail address to which customers may send
their inquiries;
|
|
Telephone, provided that the business designates a specific
toll-free telephone number to which customers may send their
inquiries; and/or
|
|
Facsimile, provided that the business designates a specific
toll-free fax number to which customers may send their inquiries.
|
Informing customers of their right to receive information
about the disclosure of their personal information. A business
that discloses information to third parties for direct marketing
purposes must do at least one of the following:
|
Regularly notify its agents and managers who supervise employees
who regularly have customer contact of the procedures for
customers to obtain information about the disclosure of their
personal information;
|
|
Post the procedures for customers to obtain information
about the disclosure of their personal information on the
company’s Web site;6 and/or
|
|
Make the procedures for customers to obtain information
about the disclosure of their personal information readily
available in written form at every place of business in California
where the business or its agents regularly have contact with
customers.
|
Responding to customer inquiries about personal information disclosed
to third parties. If a customer requests to receive information
about which items of his personal information were disclosed to third
parties, the business must, within 30 days of the inquiry, provide
all of the following to that customer:
|
A list of the items of personal information that was disclosed
to third parties for the third parties’ direct marketing
purposes during the immediately preceding calendar year;7 and
|
|
The names and addresses of all of the third parties that
received personal information from the business for the third
parties’ direct marketing purposes during the preceding
calendar year, and information about the third party sufficient
to give the customer a reasonable indication of the nature
of the third parties’ business.
|
The business must provide this information to the customer in writing,
and free of charge.
Limitations on requirements. A business that is required
to comply with SB 27 is not obligated to do so in response to a request
from a customer more than once during the course of any calendar year.
In addition, SB 27 sets forth examples of certain arrangements deemed not disclosures
to third parties for the purpose this law. These examples include:
|
Disclosure of personal information that is incidental to
an arrangement with a third party for the storage, management,
or organization of data, provided that the personal information
is not used for the third party’s direct marketing
purposes;
|
|
Disclosure of information that is incidental to an arrangement
with a third party for the maintaining or servicing of accounts,
including credit account application processing, provided
that the personal information is not used for the third party’s
direct marketing purposes;
|
|
Lawful disclosures to or from consumer reporting agencies;
and
|
|
Disclosure of information to a third party for the purpose
of jointly offering a product or service to the customer.
In order to satisfy the requirements of this exemption, all
of the following requirements must be met:
1. The personal
information must be disclosed pursuant to the terms of a written
agreement between the business that discloses the personal
information, and the third party that receives the personal
information, for the purpose of jointly offering a product
or service;
2. The written
agreement must provide that the third party that receives the
personal information is required to maintain the confidentiality
of the personal information, and is prohibited from disclosing
or using the personal information other than to carry out the
joint offering or servicing of the product or service that
is the subject of the written agreement;
3. The product
or service offered must be a product or service of, and be
provided by, at least one of the businesses that is a party
to the written agreement; and
4. The product
or service must clearly and conspicuously identify: (i) all
of the parties that jointly offer, endorse, or sponsor the
product; and (ii) all of the parties that disclose and receive
customer information. This should be done by way of a pre-sale
disclosure to every potential customer. A business should not
disclose personal information under this exemption if the customer
does not in fact purchase the product or service.
|
What are the consequences of failing to comply with SB 27?
Aside from potential actions under California’s Unfair Competition
Law,8 SB 27 specifically provides that any customer
injured by a violation of this law may institute a civil action to
recover damages of up to $3,000 per violation. Moreover, unlike the
action authorized by California’s Unfair Competition Law, SB
27 authorizes a prevailing plaintiff to recover his or her reasonable
attorney fees and costs. This increases the likelihood that people
will bring these lawsuits against businesses.
What can my business do to ensure compliance with SB 27?
SB 27 is a rather complex law, with many exceptions that apply depending
on the specific activities of the business. Consequently, although
we have addressed all of the core requirements of SB 27 in this memorandum,
business owners should be aware that certain exemptions and exceptions,
if applicable to their businesses, could reduce the costs of compliance.
The best way to ensure compliance with SB 27 is to incorporate its
requirements into your company’s routine operations and its written
operating procedures. Unlike AB 1950, SB 27 does not permit management
to create reasonable procedures to address risk; SB 27 is a disclosure
statute, and, as such, its requirements are specific and mandatory.
If your business discloses information to third parties, and that
information may be used for direct marketing purposes, then you may
wish to have your procedures for this data-sharing reviewed by legal
counsel to ensure compliance with SB 27, as well as other applicable
state and federal laws.
CONCLUSION
AB 1950 and SB 27 come into effect only five months after the effective
date of California’s Online Privacy Protection Act ("OPPA"),
another piece of legislation designed to protect customer information.9 A
review of the legislative history of all of these new laws reveals
that the California legislature is greatly concerned about protecting
the personal information of California residents.
While laws like AB 1950 and SB 27 undoubtedly provide some measure
of protection to California residents, they also impose requirements
and burdens on businesses. If businesses do not adhere to those requirements,
they may be sued. Consequently, it is becoming more important each
year for businesses to be aware of their legal obligations concerning
data security, so that they can make educated decisions on how to best
allocate their resources.
________________________________
1 Cal.Civ.Code
Section 1798.81
2 Ibid
3 Cal.Civ.Code Section 1798.82
4 "Medical
information" means any individually identifiable information,
in electronic or physical form, regarding the individual's medical
history or medical treatment or diagnosis by a health care professional.
5 Cal.Bus.& Prof.Code Section
17200 et seq.
6 SB 27 has specific formatting
and placement requirements for businesses choosing this option. Contact
us, or refer to the text of SB 27 for all of these requirements.
7 Note that the business is not
required to provide the actual data that was disclosed to the third
parties, only the type of data, e.g., "social security
number" or "date of birth."
8 See
note 5 supra
9 Refer
to http:/www.slglegal.com/OPPA.htm for
an article discussing the OPPA.
If you would like to discuss your company’s strategy to comply
with these new laws (as well as existing information security law not
discussed in this memorandum), please contact us.
For more information, contact:
|
Michael D. Schley
|
805-966-2940
|
|
Joseph F. Look
|
805-688-9226
|
|
Ian M. Guthrie
|
805-966-2985
|
|
Brett Locker
|
805-963-4929
|
This Memo was prepared with the assistance of Christina Stokholm ,
law clerk.
|
|